Wednesday, April 25, 2012

I Can Change Your Mind About Climate = 65,000km trip = 60 tonnes of carbon = 60 minutes of hot air | thetelegraph.com.au

The program flew the pair across Australia, then to Hawaii, Boston, New York, San Francisco, Washington and London filming meetings with leading professors and anti-global warming bloggers.

Mr Nasht said producers purchased renewable energy offsets for Ms Rose and four production crew.

...Ms Rose said yesterday: "Nick did not present any evidence or coherent explanation for why the world has warmed so significantly that could be attributed to anything other than fossil fuels, cars, coal-fired power stations."

Netherlands: "Asparagus quickly sold at these prices"

Due to the continuing cold weather, the European supply of asparagus is disappointing. The prices at auction are at a level of between 7 and 9 Euro.

ATI vs UVA (University of Virginia) re Climategate emails [16-minute video] - YouTube

ATI's Freedom of Information lawsuit on behalf of Virginia taxpayers is headed to the Virginia Supreme Court. This video gives the context and a brief history of Climategate and its relation to Michael Mann while at the University of Virginia.

Belgium: "We learned from frost this winter"

At the end of January we were informed that there would be frost in February, but growers did not expect that it would be so severe. A relatively small number covered their products before or during the frost. We learned this season that it is useful and very important that next time everything is covered against frost. There were too many quality problems and damage was considerable

Sceptics must start warming to the reality of climate science | brisbanetimes.com.au

Science is debate. Science is about balancing evidence. Scientific debates are about the weight of evidence and they are conducted in peer-reviewed literature, which screens out ideas and opinions that do not withstand scrutiny.

'Climategate' scientist speaks out : Nature News

In one e-mail, dated July 2004, Jones wrote to Mann: "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"

1 comment:

Bruce Hall said...

Some people cannot connect the dots... even if you guide their hands.

AWG is a falsifiable theory that has been shown to be false [at least in its predictive powers] many times. Rather than learn from the failures and listen to the data, alarmist prefer to change the data to fit the theory. Hence the theory cannot be falsified.